(A) for a large plurality of users, a first software driven “User Profile” module for knowing a respective user of the plurality by creating, maintaining, and updating a profile of the user having therewith at least one characterization of the user's perspective including at least one needs-appropriate wellbeing orientation or criteria, and at least one privacy preference, wherein said first software driven module is residing on a device selected from the list: (i) the respective user's device of a first plurality of electronic communications enabled users' devices, and (ii) at least one platform enabled with electronic communications to the respective user's device, to a plurality of other said user devices, and to at least one electronically stored knowledge-base;

(B) in electronic communications with the first software driven module, a second software driven “Needs Definition” module for accepting and understanding at least one needs description of the respective user including at least one needs-appropriate wellbeing criteria, wherein understanding includes convolving the needs description into a respective wellbeing criteria weighted plurality of substantially equivalent aspects selected from the list: attributes, tags, synonyms, replacements, substitutions, decompositions, sub-needs, features, aspects, transformations, proximate word clusters occurring in a knowledge-base, key words, markup language codes, and free form text;

(C) in electronic communications with the second software driven module, a third software driven “Matching Solutions” module for finding at least one answer to the needs description by (i) projecting the understood at least one needs description onto the at least one electronically stored knowledge-base, respectively containing any of relevant solutions and/or people who can help find relevant solutions, (ii) filtering said projections using any of the user profile, and/or the user's wellbeing criteria, and (iii) weighting the filtered projection using the at least one characterization of the user's perspective; and

(D) in electronic communications with the third software driven module, a fourth software driven “Presenting Solutions” module for matching the user with access to the user's preferred portions of said weighted and filtered projection onto the at least one electronically stored knowledge-base.

(A) creating an instant community for the respective user by inverse projecting large subsets of said weighted and filtered projection back onto the large plurality of users according to said users' profiles and needs descriptions;

(B) filtering any users out of the instant community using said any user's respective profile, wellbeing orientation, wellbeing criteria, and privacy preference;

(C) sorting suggestions for potential bilateral and multilateral communications between the respective user and the filtered community by pair-wise thresholding comparisons of profile, wellbeing orientation, and needs-appropriate wellbeing criteria; and

(D) providing access for said communications to the respective user and to at least one other user according to the sorted suggestions.

(A) classifying the filtered community into castes of users having understanding of said weighted and filtered projection (i) by virtue of their having expertise therein, (ii) by virtue of their having experienced a similar need, (iii) by virtue of their curiosity about said projection, (iv) by virtue of having similar wellbeing orientation, (v) by virtue of having similar wellbeing criteria, (vi) by virtue of combinations of these virtues, and (vii) by their ability to provide solutions to the user's needs according to his wellbeing criteria and/or wellbeing orientation; and

(B) presenting electronic communications navigator options to the respective user for networking the respective user into at least one of said castes.

(A) a first of the pair is selected from the list: (i) sending feedback; (ii) suggesting enhancing at least one wellbeing metric, wellbeing orientation, or wellbeing criteria, and (iii) interrogating potential life quality by trying alternative weight and filter combinations of the portions of said projection; and wherein

(B) a second of the pair is selected from the list (i) receiving notice of credit for a fungible currency unit for wellbeing exchange, (ii) receiving a personal-decision summary view of potential shorter-range resultant changes in a wellbeing metric for an aggregate of needs, (iii) receiving an amended list of solutions including their new rating and weighting according to any of the changes made by the user to his wellbeing criteria, metric and/or orientation, and (iv) receiving a life-strategy assistant summary view of potential longer-range resultant changes in a wellbeing metric for an aggregate of needs.

(A) expanding the user profile by transforming the user profile into a needs description to further define the user according to electronically stored knowledge-bases; and

(B) allowing the user to examine and update the expanded profile derived from a projection therefrom.

(A) simulating using combinations of iterative perturbations about the at least one wellbeing orientation and about the at least one needs-appropriate wellbeing criteria;

(B) evaluating the simulation resultant weighted and filtered projections using a life quality metric selected from the list: a current standard MNS wellbeing quantification; a current predetermined wellbeing quantification performed at arms-length according to any individual or combination of academic, commercial, NGO, or governmental wellbeing standards, a different predetermined version of any of the aforesaid quantifications, and a subjective characterization of any of the aforesaid quantifications;

(C) extracting the projections having a life quality metric that is equal to or greater than a respective life quality metric for a combination of the user's wellbeing orientation and wellbeing criteria;

(D) sorting the extraction according to respective future flourishing life longevity horizon distance; and

(E) presenting the user with access (i) to statistics describing the sorted extraction and (ii) to any user selected instantiation of an extracted projection.

(A) trying hypothetical substantially proximate perturbations of the characterization;

(B) searching therewith for at least one respective knowledge-base projected instantiation having a better life quality metric wellbeing quantification than the knowledge-base portions derived according to the at least one wellbeing orientation and the at least one needs-appropriate wellbeing criteria; and

(C) presenting the user with access to statistics describing and comparing respective future flourishing life longevity horizon distances for (i) the at least one respective better life quality metric knowledge-base projected instantiation and for (ii) any user selected instantiation of an extracted projection.

(A) evaluating a change of the profile using a life quality metric selected from the list: a current standard MNS wellbeing quantification; a current predetermined wellbeing quantification performed at arms-length according to any individual or combination of academic, commercial, NGO, or governmental wellbeing standards; a different predetermined version of any of the aforesaid quantifications; and a subjective characterization of any of the aforesaid quantifications;

(B) normalizing any said change in the life quality metric quantification evaluation for the profile according to a most current of said at least one needs-appropriate wellbeing criteria; and

(C) for an account of the respective user, crediting or debiting the account with said normalized metric of a wellbeing currency, and the currency is selected from the list: goods, a valuation for services, points, credits, rewards, acknowledgments, vouchers, coupons, financial instruments, real monetary units, and abstract monetary units.

(A) applying a neural network to monitor dimensions of the profile for risk mitigation relevant changes to a life quality metric quantification of the user, and

(B) transmitting to the user (i) at least one fast recognition representation of the life quality metric quantification, (ii) an alert in an event of a substantially diminishing flourishing life opportunity for the user, and (iii) an alarm in an event of a worse case scenario being discovered beyond the respective user's current future flourishing life longevity horizon.

(A) electing a perspective selected from the list: the user, and a caste of users having understanding of said weighted and filtered projection (i) by virtue of their having expertise therein, (ii) by virtue of their having experienced a similar need, (iii) by virtue of their curiosity about said projection, (iv) by virtue of having similar wellbeing orientation, (v) by virtue of having similar wellbeing criteria, (vi) by virtue of combinations of these virtues; and therewith

(B) abstracting user proportional (i) vectors of wellbeing onto the monitored dimensions, and (ii) derivatives or gradients of said vectors.

(A) crowd-sourcing the caste by transmitting a solicitation to a substantial plurality of members of that caste; wherein the solicitation includes (i) the respective user's current particulars of life quality metric quantification, of flourishing life opportunity, and of future flourishing life longevity horizon; and (ii) a request for the member to provide at least one response selected from the list: advice, opinion, recommendation, comment, vote, and gifting to the user of some quantity of a wellbeing currency; and the currency is selected from the list: goods, services, points, credits, rewards, acknowledgments, vouchers, coupons, financial instruments, real monetary units, and abstract monetary units;

(B) aggregating the members' response to form a concept-picture of applicable collective best practices knowledge understanding of the user's life quality metric; and

(C) sharing this concept-picture with the user and with the substantial plurality of members of that caste.

(I) a large set of mutually result-relevant informational links having at least two large sub-sets of said links selected from the list: access to documents, access to presentations, and access to respectively concerned persons, access to solutions, access to potential needs' providers, and access to self-help solutions; and said links are redundantly distributed into at least two user-selectable referencing layer representations of respectively interrelated-results:

(A) a lower resolution overview map representation layer organized into a plurality of portions, (i) wherein each portion is a logical combination of at least two dimensional-type first categories, (ii) wherein are displayed a plurality of map-legend defined symbols positioned according to their respective first category combination attributes, and (iii) wherein a preponderance of said symbols respectively correspond to clusters of said links having substantial first category combination similarity therein; and

(B) a higher resolution overlay layer that is (i) alternately user-selection firstly navigable-over-the-map as a substantially portion-sized frame, and is (ii) alternately user-selection secondly organized into a respective plurality of said links, which are arranged as a logical combination of at least two dimensional-type second categories, wherein are displayed a plurality of map-legend defined symbols proximate to their appropriate link and convolved therewith; and

(II) electronic communications enabled software modules bridging

(A) from the large set of mutually result-relevant informational links,

(B) through at least two of said at least two user-selectable referencing layer representations of respectively interrelated-results,

(C) to a graphic display device upon which user significant sections of said referencing layer representations are displayed.